BTKX | TRAINING PATHWAYS
Map a grain-header mechanism and justify an inspection
Before the lesson. Confirm the equipment configuration, permitted actions and approved procedure. Use the blank fields to record the learner’s own observations and results.
Task identification
| Learner / group | Instructor / date | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Equipment / software and version | Approved procedure / authorisation |
Learning objective
Explain the represented header process and propose a configuration-supported inspection using recorded observations.
Preparation
- Identify the accepted header configuration and the applicable procedure.
- Instructor confirms permitted demonstration, access conditions and materials.
- Provide the component diagram and clearly label any hypothetical service concern.
Observation and evidence record
| Represented component | Observed movement | Process role | Hypothesis or concern | Permitted next inspection | Evidence still required |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Individual explanation
1. How do the reel, cutter and auger relate in the represented process?
2. Which statements are direct observations and which are hypotheses?
3. What makes the proposed inspection relevant and supported?
4. Which additional system or information would be needed to discuss threshing or cleaning?
Assessor review
| Assessment area | Achieved / repeat / not observed | Feedback and evidence reference |
|---|---|---|
| Accurate represented-system boundary | ||
| Configuration-matched mechanism explanation | ||
| Clear observation record | ||
| Supported inspection proposal with evidence limits |
Complete the rubric with your institution’s assessment criteria, scoring and pass requirements before use.