Competition Delivery
Prepare learners with the specified contest equipment, fault logic, virtual tasks and assessment workflow. Confirm the event year and technical-file version before selecting the system.
The Training Route
Connect the named competition configuration with repeated virtual and physical practice, then review progress through comparable assessment records.
Relate the event’s technical files to the vehicle, connection platform, controls and designated measurement points used in practice.
Identify the equipment and task version that each exercise represents.
Rotate validated diagnostic tasks through the matching simulation and supervised physical stations using a common task sequence.
Apply a repeatable diagnostic method across the approved fault library.
Compare timed simulation records with a common rubric and record physical task observations separately.
Review accuracy, time and procedure using records tied to the task and software version.
The Equipment Combination
Select the vehicle and connection equipment specified by the named event, then match the simulation to that configuration and task-file revision. The practice package combines validated fault tasks, licensed virtual access and physical equipment selected for the event.
| Item | Teaching Configuration |
|---|---|
| Reference competition vehicle | Geely Geometry G6: 150 kW, 310 N·m, 52.8 kWh / 352 V ternary-lithium liquid-cooled pack; dimensions 4,752 × 1,804 × 1,503 mm. |
| E-drive practice equipment | Select the assembly and inspection platform specified by the event’s current technical files. Confirm motor, power supply, instruments and approved fault tasks as a complete configuration. |
| Fault connection platform | A vehicle-matched non-destructive connection system. Confirm harness mapping, supported ECUs, teaching measurement points and validated fault list for the actual vehicle. |
| Virtual venue reference | Documented 2023 national secondary-vocational competition package: 1:1 model; device accuracy <1 cm; tool accuracy <0.5 cm; ≥80 measurement points; ≥300 data items; ≥80 operation steps per practical project. |
| Assessment | Timed simulation scores and visualized grade management; reference 1/2/8-point fault logic. Physical practical assessment remains a separate observed task. |
| Classroom access | Client/server deployment with agreed licenses, workstations, concurrent learners and server configuration; group rotation at the physical equipment. |
From Equipment to Teaching
Combine class-wide virtual rehearsal with supervised physical rotations, using a common rubric to review progress while recording software results and practical observations separately.
Match the named contest device, adapters and technical-file revision before planning exercises. Demonstrate how the selected simulation corresponds to the physical controls and measurement points so learners practise the same represented configuration.
Rotate validated tasks across the event’s supported systems and ask learners to justify each diagnosis. Use only instructor-approved fault combinations, keeping the delivered exercise list distinct from the connection board’s hardware capacity.
Use timed simulation records and a common rubric to review progress, recording the software version, task and permitted assistance. Observe physical tasks separately so comparisons reflect both software performance and practical procedure.
Plan licensed simulation access for class-wide preparation and repeated diagnostic practice, alongside supervised rotations at the physical equipment. Reserve practical time for learners to demonstrate tool handling and measurements as well as their software performance.
Map the event’s technical files to the practice vehicle, approved connection platform and matching simulation. Learners should recognize the same task sequence, controls and measurement points across both teaching layers.
Combine class-wide virtual rehearsal with supervised physical rotations. Compare timed records using a common rubric, and record practical handling separately from software scores.
Project Experience & References
Tie equipment and assessment claims to a named event, year, learner group and technical-file version, with occupational references identified separately.
The company records seven consecutive years as a national NEV competition equipment supplier and 150+ national and provincial competitions organized or supported since 2016.
Selected milestones include exclusive title sponsorship of the 2023 Baitong Kexin Cup NEV Maintenance Worker Competition and organization of the 2025 Baitong Kexin Cup NEV Testing Technology event.
Review the Dated Competition Record ↗The documented virtual reference specifies device-model accuracy below 1 cm, tool accuracy below 0.5 cm, at least 80 measurement points, 300 data items and 80 operation steps per practical project.
Request a demonstration license, the specific title’s task list and a comparison with the ordered hardware. Competition designation can be checked against the relevant organizer’s published notices; it should be tied to a named event and year.
Application FAQs
No. Confirm the event year, vehicle configuration, connection harness, fault library, measurement panel and technical-file revision. A matching vehicle name alone does not establish equivalence.
No. Simulation records support repetition and comparison within the software. Instructors still need to observe physical handling, permitted measurements and the approved work procedure on actual equipment.
Request the equipment and software version list, event technical-file mapping, validated fault schedule, license and concurrency requirements, sample assessment records and the coach-training scope.
